Part III
This scene turns to poets who write of absence ––– its question; joy, and reverence.
only ever re-articulations; answers stand in the way
absence opening unto a light
not of salvation or utopia; but of being – questioning and loving, accepting and desiring.
hearing, seeing, smelling, touching – clearing, gathering, poeticising.
vi. hymnos .. tin iros (Pindar)
Pindar asks three times; what –––
ἀναξιφόρμιγγες ὕμνοι τίνα θεόν τίν᾽ ἥρωα τίνα δ᾽ ἄνδρα …
Hymns that rule the lyre what man, what god, what hero shall we celebrate?
Pindar, 2nd Olympian Ode
over and over ––– [fragment of a name]
Pindar’s question lingers
falls into the soil from which he drew it
vii. Daß ich.. (Rilke)
From another response to questioning, defeat –
his final elegy emerges from the labour of the other nine
a cocaine fuelled desire
for, yet also of, jubilation and joy
terror at the face of an angel; by its disastrous being (dis-aster, not-beneath-the-stars: an impossibility)
a multi-coloured trumpet marks the commencement of this ceremony with a homophony of sonorous stained glass – as doubt seeps through
the tenth elegy circles back to the first; the question returns to itself
thought, unanswered (unanswerable)
brief interlude
(o one, o none, o no one, on you) – Celan
a lament; a dissolving of the question
viii. Sind wir ganz.. (Scholem)
Someday, at the end of the nightmare of knowing,
May I emerge singing praise and jubilation to assenting angels.
[…] the false silence of sound drowning sound …
Rainer Maria Rilke
The Tenth Elegy
Who, if I cried out, would hear me among the angelic orders?
The First Elegy
Sind wir ganz von dir geschieden?
[…]
Nur dein Nichts ist die Erfahrung,
die sie von dir haben darf.
Part I
i. Prologue
In many ways this work begins where Luigi Nono’s Prometeo ends – but also, in this first part, from my own music;
a free fantasy on material from ii. & iii. Where the Quiet Rest – a recapitulation of a ‘before’
ii. Parados
entry of the performers – space maturing
& their first full utterance
Part IV
ix. il y a (Levinas)
il y a – there is
Just as the man who is hanging himself, after kicking away the stool on which he stood, the final shore, rather than
feeling the leap which he is making into the void feels only the rope which holds him, held to the end, held more
than ever, bound as he had never been before to the existence he would like to leave..
Maurice Blanchot, Thomas the Obscure
“Sound is and is indifferent to our effort
The paradigm of tonality – its demand placed upon reality; of major and minor –
desire to know, to correct –– an accosted overtone, utilised to a position of greater function.
the third: the question, sound understood by reason (Pythagoras) or by sense (Aristoxenus)
a horizon, a limit: in this work, the site in which we encounter otherness
invited to listen for the difference which exists between each tone, each interval, each distance [topos].
There is difference
sound, only ever in-different to our effort
an attempt to feel otherness ––– hear that there is tone, voice, sonority, resonance.
–––– essential otherness, commenced by Hawwah; life, in what is
open to the encounter with an other; allow your own disruption to occur
listen to an other, as other
each day is the first day”
Part II
This scene reads Genesis as a foundational myth of otherness ––
the first human (Ha’adam) as a totality, without gender, as the etymology indicates;
the creation of an other (Hawwah) as the moment of division, essential
iii. ..a day without a day (Jabés)
Imagine the blinding confrontation of a first day of consciousness; sudden existent, without history.
(imagined in several overlapping parts; day – discord choral – blank existence; days of nothing – breath – erasure)
“Imagine a day without a day behind it, a night without a previous night. […]
him a man, depriving him of memory. .. without childhood, without past. […]
The past reassures us […] Time moulds us. Without past there is no present, and the I cannot be imagined.
Fertile forgetfulness. […] It helps us to … learn and unlearn, to take what is offered.
[…] I am not. All I have ever been is the man life has allowed me to be.”
Edmond Jabés, The Book of Shares
iv. ...and caused to fall
An image of drowsing, falling — a swirl of air, dust, and breath.
Any trace of name or agency are unsung, unheard – removed: absence underscored
–––– תַּרְדֵּמָ֛ה וַיַּפֵּל֩ עַל–––– וַיִּישָׁ֑ן ––––
and .. a deep sleep to fall upon –––– and .. slept
a clarinet figure – הָאָדָ֖ם ha’adam (all and each) – sustains the ground over which the voice sing: terrified.
sudden blinding erasure
(woken, blind, from a dream –– a moment imagined between the lines of the myth)
dreaming – a glimpse of creation; the last dream alone
v. ..and dreamt (Sweelinck)
written in the manner of an echo fantasia
An imagining of the dream had; alone, among the angels; waking to the blinding confrontation of other (woken by a fragment of a name)
a dream without experience of otherness; no conception of an-other in any sense
voices sing caution; a flute and violin
a processional at the commencement of our essential otherness
“They looked at each other without a word. What could they say? They could only observe, only study their difference.
Days of boredom, of uneasiness followed. Of anxiety too. […] Living, yet without landmarks of existence..”
Edmond Jabés, The Book of Shares
coda – recapitulation and final group utterance; falls away
note –
What is an idol? An image, substituted for an object? Can a name be idolatrous?
The image we have of another person can hold us apart from them. What happens when we name and there is no object?
(fragments of names permeate this work, lines composed between two traditions)
Daß ich dereinst, an dem Ausgang der grimmigen Einsicht,
Jubel und Ruhm aufsinge zustimmenden Engeln.
[…] der falschen, aus Übertönung gemachten Stille …
Wer, wenn ich schriee, hörte mich denn aus der Engel Ordnungen?
Are we utterly estranged from You?
[…]
entitled only to experience you
in the shape of your negation.
Gershom Scholem
With a Copy of Kafka’s Trial